In your own words, explain what this definition means, then give an example of the way the rules of logic can be used to referee an argument. Use an example that contains a violation of the rules of deductive logic (e.g. Affirming the Consequent), not an example that contains an informal fallacy.
Give the general definition of an “informal fallacy” in logic, drawing on information in Appendix C and your handout.
Give one example of an informal fallacy, and explain the problem with it.
Then answer the following question: Why is the use of informal fallacies in argument as much an ethical failing as it is a problem in logic?