No Pain, No Gain? Torture and Ethics in the War on Terror’ International Affairs 82(1): 121-148

Part 1 • Alex J Bellamy (2006) ‘No Pain, No Gain? Torture and Ethics in the War on Terror’ International Affairs 82(1): 121-148 • • What argument is the author making? • What assumptions underpin the argument? • Is there anything in the article that you would like clarification of or to know more about? • Is there anything in the article that you might challenge? • What difference did reading this article make to how you think about the topic in question? (This should be around 400-500 words.) You don’t have to answer each of the questions above individually – they are just there to help you engage with the article. Part 2 Using the same article as in part one, develop your initial response to this article into a more detailed analysis. An article analysis is a sustained reflection on the detractions, merits, and implications of your chosen article. It should be no less than 1125 words and no more than 1375 words long. Your analysis should critically interrogate the assumptions and commitments of the article chosen.