Write the essay in the third person with a writer’s voice and tone that conveys objectivity and intellectual curiosity. Be quick to adopt counter arguments, even if you disagree with them. Your job is to inform, not persuade. Must use two sources listed below >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbJaMWw4-2Q >https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/02/06/climate/flood-toxic-chemicals.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage >https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-california-state-climate-change-assessment-20180827-story.html >https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-sea-level-rise-california-coast/ >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo8A10-ZOEI >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwup6tA_OzQ Do not use any other sources. Discover the part that you are most interested in developing. Please use most current MLA standards for citing sources: in-text citations and signal phrasing. Use both signal phrasing and paraphrasing stylistically throughout with appropriate in-text citations. Last page needs to be a Works Cited Page. The prompt for the essay is as follows: With the advent of natural disasters occurring in the country, should the federal government be taking on more of the financial burden to rebuild these communities, or should the state governments be the ones? Is it true that avoiding the “red tape” of a large government outweighs the needs of states devastated after a disaster? Since this country is so large, is this really only a problem for a few states in the country, or is it really a national issue? Are we being short-sighted by concerning ourselves with where people should and should not live, and how to cover the costs of more frequent natural disasters, instead of trying to figure out ways to reverse the trend of increasing natural disasters due to our current climate crisis?