com340 module 6 critical thinking

This paper has been written by one of the writer here but did not follow the guidelines/Instructions. I have attached previous work on this paper and the professor comment and Rubric. Please go over the attachment very well before you bid or start this paper, You can write a new paper or work on the previous one.

Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)

IMPORTANT! READ FIRST

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission. (Note: This assignment is not a Milestone for the Portfolio Project, so you can choose either option.)


Option #1: Evaluating an Organization’s Crowdsourcing Campaign

Write a 3-page paper (not including the required cover and reference pages) that defines crowdsourcing and explains how culture contributes to its effectiveness. Culture is generally regarded as a collective way of life of a group of people including their beliefs, values, customs, arts, and attitudes. Next, identify a company that has effectively used crowdsourcing and evaluate its crowdsourced campaign by answering the following questions:

  • What about the campaign was memorable and effective?
  • What ethical considerations needed to be part of the campaign?
  • What could have been improved? How?

Support your paper with a minimum of two scholarly sources in addition to the course resources. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find your sources. Your paper must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).

Review the rubric for this Critical Thinking assignment in the Module 6 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.

Option #2: Proposing a Crowdsourcing Campaign

Write a 3-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that defines crowdsourcing and that explains how culture contributes to its effectiveness. Culture is generally regarded as a collective way of life of a group of people including their beliefs, values, customs, arts, and attitudes. Next, select an existing organization (or use the organization that you have selected for your Portfolio Project) and propose a way in which crowdsourcing could effectively be used to promote the organization’s brand, product, and/or services. Be creative – try to come up with something innovative!

In your paper, provide your rationale as to why the proposed crowdsourcing campaign would be memorable and how it utilizes effective social media strategies. Be sure to address any ethical concerns relating to your proposed campaign and include suggestions for how it could be improved.

Support your paper with a minimum of two scholarly sources in addition to the course resources. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources. Your paper must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).

Review the rubric for this Critical Thinking assignment in the Module 6 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

COM340 Mod 6 CT

COM340 Mod 6 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the use of crowdsourcing campaigns using social media, and legal and ethical considerations.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem Solving

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving to utilize social media strategies to improve a crowdsourcing campaign.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in problem solving.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate problem solving.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.